Seen a new grift from Chris Costa, who is now championing mounting scopes on exaggerately tall rings, high off the bore.
Now I'm seeing this new trend of people mounting Acogs, LPVOs, & Long range scopes on towering scope rings.
The new grift is claming quicker target acquisition through scopes mounted high off the bore, because of better neck possition.
Why I reject C-clamp...
1) increased support arm fatigue,
2) overall center of gravity is shifted foward & unbalanced,
3) periphial vision between 10:00 & 12:00 is blocked,
4) thumb obstructs view through optics,
5) reasons 1 & 2 are made worse with a heavy rifle... like the M1A.
Why I reject High Bore Scopes... it greatly exaggerates bullet drop compensation.
I'm not buying in to this lastest, greatest, tacticoolness.
Now I'm seeing this new trend of people mounting Acogs, LPVOs, & Long range scopes on towering scope rings.
The new grift is claming quicker target acquisition through scopes mounted high off the bore, because of better neck possition.
Why I reject C-clamp...
1) increased support arm fatigue,
2) overall center of gravity is shifted foward & unbalanced,
3) periphial vision between 10:00 & 12:00 is blocked,
4) thumb obstructs view through optics,
5) reasons 1 & 2 are made worse with a heavy rifle... like the M1A.
Why I reject High Bore Scopes... it greatly exaggerates bullet drop compensation.
I'm not buying in to this lastest, greatest, tacticoolness.