M14 Forum banner

Springfield M1A with a lot of TRW parts and lock bar sights

442 views 23 replies 9 participants last post by  Ben@HI  
#1 ·
I've had this Springfield M1A for years, it has a lot of TRW parts on it which is nice. It had a M1 lock bar sight on it when I got it which I thought was strange. I traded the lock bar sights to my cousin who needed them for his WW2 M1 and he gave me the M14 metric sights that where on his M1. The thing is, those lock bar sights looked like they had been on their since the rifle was made. Did Springfield use lock bar sights when they were building these? I know they used all kinds of surplus parts so it wouldn't surprise me but I haven't seen other M1A's with lock bar sights.



Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
 
#6 ·
I knew the housing wasn't TRW and it didn't look like the same quality as the other parts but I assumed it was an 80's replacement part or something. It didn't occur to me that it would be commercial. It works fine so I don't see any reason to change it unless the commercial housings are prone to fail or wear out quicker.
 
#9 ·
That's pretty much how mine looked when I got it. I switched out the stock, i didn't like the black synthetic one. The sights I traded out with my cousin, the butt plate because I didn't like the rubber one and the flash hider because it had the lug ground off. I may switch out the trigger group seeing as it's commercial. I don't have any TRW ones but I have a Springfield one.
 
#5 · (Edited)
My observation is the use of lockbar sights on standard M1As goes back to at least the early 1980s, in the 15k serial range.

For example, I bought this one in 2022. It was pretty original, including the early 1980s recall bolt that I had SAI swap out. These lockbars went on a refinished M1 Garand. (The clip guide is an SAI commercial part for one of their early scope mounts). The random use of lockbar sights on standard M1As are seen into the late 1990s. The NM and Supermatch rifles of that era always seem got the proper sights with metric pinions.

Image


That 1981 SAI was a donor action that went through a bit of transformation once I acquired it…
Image


Image
 
#15 · (Edited)
My early 1992 built M1A had an SAI commercial trigger group that would eventually go off safe if the trigger was pulled multiple times with the safety on. I believe the issue was not the housing itself, but the commercial cast hammer, safety, trigger, and other components that were installed in it.

Your housing looks like it is filled with good USGI parts. If that is the case, as long as it passes a safety check and locks up on the stock snugly, you should be just fine.
 
#16 ·
It locks up good and tight, works fine, no issues with the safety or anything. Only issue I've had has been a mag blow out while shooting. Accidently loaded a couple of a friend's flea market reloads in my mag while we were shooting together. Scared the hell out of me and bent the floor plate on a pro mag but no damage to the rifle and about 400 rounds later no issues. It's probably sacrilege around here to say this but his G3 ate those garbage reloads like they were nothing. You could hear some of them were WAY to hot but that HK didn't care.
 
#20 ·
I did buy a Portuguese clone of a G3 which actually has a lot of HK parts on it a couple of years ago but I haven't shot it much. It corrugate's my brass and I don't like it as much as my M1A. The trigger pull is horrible haha.
 
#23 ·
Some of the rifles have matching SNs on some of the internals like the op rod and bolt. If yours does thats great. Is there a SN on the other (left) side of the magazine well . ? It might be crossed thru.
 
#24 ·
No other numbers on the receiver, mismatched crossed out number on the butt stock metal, no serial number on the bolt that i could find. Bolt, butt stock metal are HK marked and the stock, trigger housing look HK but no markings outside of a serial number that doesn't match anything.