I can only attest to the ST-10, of which I have 2.
The optics are good, but overrated. Much better than Leupold, but not close to Zeiss or Swarovski.
But the reason to mount a USO is because it is an absolute tank - no other scope built like it, including IOR and S&B. Only the IOR is almost as rugged.
Now, here is my gripe against USO: The eye relief is nowhere near the 3.5"-3.75" stated specs! And the eye relief focal range is extremely small. If you mount a Zeiss or Swarovski, you can slide the thing forward and back all day long and still have tons of range to get good eye relief. The USO will give you a small zone, that's it.
I'll buy a USO only if severe service is higher on the list than user friendliness.
The optics are good, but overrated. Much better than Leupold, but not close to Zeiss or Swarovski.
But the reason to mount a USO is because it is an absolute tank - no other scope built like it, including IOR and S&B. Only the IOR is almost as rugged.
Now, here is my gripe against USO: The eye relief is nowhere near the 3.5"-3.75" stated specs! And the eye relief focal range is extremely small. If you mount a Zeiss or Swarovski, you can slide the thing forward and back all day long and still have tons of range to get good eye relief. The USO will give you a small zone, that's it.
I'll buy a USO only if severe service is higher on the list than user friendliness.