Absolutely. My Scout Squad will positively neutralize any threat outside of my house. For an infiltrator inside my house, I'll reach for my M(ini)1A first... a Ruger Mini-14 Tactical in 7.62x35. Horses for courses (when and if possible).
If you're interested I have a Mesa Tactical High Tube Adaptor from my delta14 setup. I ended up goin to a blackfeather setup. It will negate the need for a comb riser and you'll be able to use the casm again. Check out my socom thread, I literally tried every stupid thing a guy could.I have been through multiple configurations of the M14 throughout the years. I have never been able to fully settle or be satisfied with a set up that fills a "do-all" role. I am working on a project for a .308 rifle for the proverbial "SHTF" scenario that creates great discussion. I love the M14 platform and wanted to use my SOCOM 16 to fulfill that role but, I have had some set backs that I hoped you may be able to help with.
- I wanted magnified optics (preferably a LPVO of some sort) but, while trying to overcome the cheek weld issue, I have found that I have often had to choose between the optic or the iron sights. I would want the irons to maintain a back up sight role while focusing on optics. I have a CASM GENII mount I was trying to utilize as I liked how lightweight it is while ignoring the side mounting used by others. Although it's peep sight is very limiting, it at least had the "back up" aspect covered. By raising the stock to optics level, the iron sights become unusable without adjustment. How have you overcome this for your rifles?
- Although there are other chassis systems out there that might alleviate this issue, they all seem to be relatively heavy. As of now I have utilized the Delta 14 chassis as a way to modernize the platform without increasing weight. However, the issue of sight alignment is still not solved. Also, because the chassis is 2 pieces (chassis + buttstock assembly), there is some flex behind the receiver where the connection point is. This has me concerned for long term durability as the stock and chassis are held together by a single screw. The factory stock at least has full rigidity while remaining relatively light weight. Unfortunately it does not have the MLOK mounting options or weight reduction aspect of the Delta 14. What compromises have you found between weight, durability and functionality in your hunt for a great stock/chassis system?
I have been through this ride a few times now and am still having a hard time settling! I have a Sig Sauer 716i that is fully set up for the same role but, I wanted to prove to myself that I could get the same ease of use and function from the M14 and not feel it necessary to settle for a soul-less AR-10 just because of "things" Any help would be appreciated!
Here is the current set up:
View attachment 454798
SA M1A SOCOM 16
Delta 14 Chassis
Mesa Tactical LEO Telescoping Stock Adapter (Mossberg 500)
Magpul CTR w/ 0.75" Riser
Hogue Overmolded AR-15 Grip
Magpul MVG
Ultimak M8 Rail
Trijicon MRO
Olight Odin Mini
I removed the CASM mount once I couldn't settle on proper cheek weld at least in this configuration. Even with the .75" riser it wasn't even close to cutting it. But, I am open to ideas! Even a scout scope? The Ultimak M8 rail is a game changer I will admit that.
Thanks for your help,
MP
Art, this picture will never get old. However, on behalf of the rest of the forum, I would like to request some different angles. Some of the gals in the 2nd and 3rd row are hard to see in detail.After a few decades of trying, I have come to the conclusion, which many told me when I started looking, no such animal. And as posted earlier, you end up with a tool that is equally poor in all categories.
You just need more rifles with the available variations. Grab the one you " need " at the moment to do the job at hand in the best way possible.
View attachment 454896
Completely agree. For me, tinkering around with configurations is just as fun as going to the range to then test them out. Seeing what others are doing is interesting, and often inspires me to keep fiddling with different setups and systems. Cheers, everyone!I do enjoy these threads, simply seeing what each person feels a "do all" setup really accentuates there's no right answer per se.
Well, spill the beans, what ya changing?This has been an extremely helpful thread. Thanks to everyone who has chimed in with ideas. I have already started the process of changing things up. Again. For the 18th time haha!
Well for now, I am back in the SA factory stock but keeping the ultimak M8 installed. I am bouncing between the idea of a scout scope as opposed to the trijicon MRO for a more purposeful set up. The cheek riser situation may not be necessary with the ultimak but I will report back on that. If worse comes to worse, I might pop back into a cheek rest configuration and throw the CASM mount back on. I realized that I was just forcing my M1A to be the same as my AR-10 and that just wasn't cutting it for me as the AR-10 is just superior for fixing the issues I was experiencing. I am going to go back to the reason that makes the M1A a great battle rifle and try to rely on it's strengths rather than trying to make it something it isn't. Haha I know, about face. But this thread really gave me some good ideas. I'll throw a picture in the thread of the Sig 716i for fun and an update on the M1A as well. The sling is another situation of uncertainty. I tried to utilize the Sadlak front rail as a way to use a foregrip. I tried the Fab Defense RSG because it offers a pic rail attachment I thought I could utilize as a sling attachment point while also having the foregrip as a nice option. It worked kind of but not in a way that I liked so I scrapped that idea. Haha it never ends. But I love this process as much as I hate it.Well, spill the beans, what ya changing?
This is a really impressive set up. Very cool! Thanks for sharing it. The issue I was having was the cheek rest height. How do you overcome that especially when utilizing the red dot?View attachment 455172 View attachment 455173
As food for thought, this isn’t a do-all configuration, but my SHTF configuration.
I find the pistol grip best for versatility. Torch on one side. SEI vortex flash hider. Cheek weld perfect for me with casm. I have laser zeroed to 25 years for CQB, scope zeroed 25/200, and I can go from scope to red dot zeroed to 100 by only slightly lowering my shoulders. I find the red dot up top to be the fastest way to go from scope to dot. Plus, much faster to aim red dot than irons. For me, this is the most versatile setup for an end of days scenario.
Well for now, I am back in the SA factory stock but keeping the ultimak M8 installed. I am bouncing between the idea of a scout scope as opposed to the trijicon MRO for a more purposeful set up. The cheek riser situation may not be necessary with the ultimak but I will report back on that. If worse comes to worse, I might pop back into a cheek rest configuration and throw the CASM mount back on. I realized that I was just forcing my M1A to be the same as my AR-10 and that just wasn't cutting it for me as the AR-10 is just superior for fixing the issues I was experiencing. I am going to go back to the reason that makes the M1A a great battle rifle and try to rely on it's strengths rather than trying to make it something it isn't. Haha I know, about face. But this thread really gave me some good ideas. I'll throw a picture in the thread of the Sig 716i for fun and an update on the M1A as well. The sling is another situation of uncertainty. I tried to utilize the Sadlak front rail as a way to use a foregrip. I tried the Fab Defense RSG because it offers a pic rail attachment I thought I could utilize as a sling attachment point while also having the foregrip as a nice option. It worked kind of but not in a way that I liked so I scrapped that idea. Haha it never ends. But I love this process as much as I hate it.