M14 Forum banner

1 - 20 of 27 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I have a 20,xxx serial number m1a with horribly ugly machine marks, weird flat spots and unfinished blending. Has anyone else experienced this? I'm really considering buying a different receiver.
433701
433704
433702
433703
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,474 Posts
Retired 5-0

If you wish to sell that "Ugly Duckling" reciever please let me have the first right of refusal.

Seriously, how well does your rifle shoot?

I do not worry about the imperfections on my guns so long as the imperfections do not hamper function.

Regards,
D1
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
15,780 Posts
Cosmetic blemishes give your rifle character, that's all.
 

·
Forum Jester
Joined
·
7,115 Posts
if your disgusted with it and don't want it anymore,xmas is coming soon and you can send it to my house
 
  • Like
Reactions: nf1e

·
Registered
Joined
·
56 Posts
I’d offer to buy the receiver it I don’t have the required 30 posts yet lol. As long as everything works I wouldn’t worry too much.
 

·
Forum Jester
Joined
·
7,115 Posts
close enough for government work
 
  • Like
Reactions: High Hat

·
Premium Member
Honorary Forum Lifer
Joined
·
16,460 Posts
I'm in the minority voice, I like better attention to detail, nice machining, and nice finishes. How does the op rod track look? I've seen many in the "Golden Era" receivers where that specific area looks rough. Some like the 5 line receivers because it says 7.62mm.

Try looking at M1As in the 100,xxx to 150,xxx range, I'm not exactly sure the range parameters but I loosely call it the 2nd golden era. I have a 129,xxx and a 145,xxx and the receivers are in spec, no big flaws, no bolt roller defect, no bolt roller interference on the outer stripper clip guide boss, nicely machined op rod track, nice finish, nice pretty even heelstamp, etc. If I was to get another one it would probably be in this range. I also had one in the lower 260,xxx range and it was nice, I just haven't seen many myself in that range. Early receivers are sought after but not so much by me, the heel was thinner on earlier s/n ranges and some very early ones don't fit other stocks well because there is a step on the right side of the receiver. You can always look around at gun shows and see one in person and rebuild it like I'm doing.
m14brian
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,562 Posts
So long as they're right on the surfaces that matter, I don't care if they have some extra character.

For whatever reason, it seems to be relatively normal in this family of rifles. If you were paying through the teeth to get jewelry-quality work done, then yeah, I wouldn't pay for it.

But if you did want to change out the receiver, I wouldn't hold it against you. But you might want to see how it shoots first. If it is a shooter, I'd leave it alone, and buy another rifle to be pretty.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
304 Posts
Sounds like you wouldnt have a problem getting what you really want. I would also be interested in yours because of the old and rough condition
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
46 Posts
I purchased a SA Socom I believe a year ago, and I sold it LOL because of Cosmetically I just didn't like the finish and I didn't like the stamping Springfield went from ok to worse IMO. But I didn't loose any money.....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,294 Posts
My 415,xxx series SOCOM is beautiful , nice finish & no defects I can tell . Some of the Early Bula's were kinda rough also.Its up to you if you want to keep it of off it , I would see how it shoots , as has been said .
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,955 Posts
These M14 types rifles are expensive, particularly when compared to other rifles on the market, and yet they are some of the worst products I have seen. If buying just a receiver your looking at between $550 to $1000 and the manufactures tell you...you get what you get and you don't throw a fit!

On the CMP forum right now there is a discussion about a particular brand of receiver, though to be honest it could be any of the current manufacturers. The receiver in question is terribly out of spec not just cosmetically. Is this the norm, no but these things should never happen, subpar products should never make it out the door, yet we see it time and again.

I know many folks here do as I do, buy a receiver and start looking for the parts to build that once in a life time rifle. The cost for a quality build will be beyond $2000, thats a lot of jack Jack! When we go to build a year later or more, often times we find that the receiver is not in spec! Now we have a receiver that no longer has a warranty and can't be built until it has been brought into spec, most home builders can't do this kind of work. Now its time to send it back to the manufacturer who says its no longer under warranty, or since you tried to build with it, we won't warranty it.

I will be the first to admit that I am very picky, but none of my builds cost less that $3500 and a couple far beyond that!! So I think I have the right to be demanding, of the quality of the parts being used and the Armors doing the build.

I still have a couple projects to finish and my M14 collection will be complete. I have a builder in mind if he will take the work, I hope he will as he is both conscious of the need to build it correctly and carefully!

You guys buying just receivers. When you get your receiver send it to a gunsmith you trust and have them look it over, make sure its right, that way if it has issues you know to send it back before the so called warranty runs out! That is good advice.

REN
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,430 Posts
Back in the early days, you really needed to inspect the receiver before buying. I remember some of them the casting surface finished peeked through the side clean-up machining, most unsightly.

Armscorp receievers also suffered from visual blemishes, I remember one of them had an almost oval shaped cut-out for the bolt open....
 
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Top