M14 Forum banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,869 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I do not trust the Marxist-in-Chief, the Attorney General, or the BATF to determine what are "shotguns with common military features that are unsuitable for traditional shotgun sports" to derermine whether or not they should be banned. :ARM33:

Ithaca Model 37

Remington Model 870

Winchester Model 1200

Mossberg Model 590

http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=6172

Proposed Shotgun Import Ban Shows Need To Change Law

Friday, January 28, 2011

On Thursday, Jan. 27, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives released a Study on the Importability of Certain Shotguns, which proposes that “military shotguns, or shotguns with common military features that are unsuitable for traditional shotgun sports” be prohibited from importation.

This would apply to all shotguns—not just semi-automatics. As in previous “working group” studies on rifles, the study fails to give proper credit to the widespread use of these guns in newer shooting sports, or to their adaptability to hunting.

The study underscores the need for Congress to change the firearm importation law. That law requires the Attorney General to approve the importation of any firearm “generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.” This “sporting purposes” test was imposed by the Gun Control Act in 1968, a time when the right to self-defense with a firearm was not as widely respected by the courts as it is today.

Clearly, the main reason to change the law is that the Second Amendment—as the Supreme Court said in District of Columbia v. Heller—protects our right to keep and bear arms for defense, not for sports.

In its 2008 Heller decision, the court observed that “the inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second Amendment right” and ruled that the Second Amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” particularly within the home, where “the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute.”

The court also dismissed the notion that the amendment doesn’t protect modern arms, saying “Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms.”

Another reason to change the law is to end the BATFE’s 22-year history of misinterpreting it. In 1989, the bureau banned the importation of semi-automatic rifles, claiming they were not used for “organized marksmanship competition.” (In fact, the banned guns were of the type most commonly used by competitors in the most popular marksmanship competitions in the United States—the National Matches, and the hundreds of local, state and regional competitions that precede the national events each year.)

In 1998, BATFE expanded the ban, absurdly claiming that semi-automatic rifles’ “suitability for this activity [marksmanship competition] is limited.” At the time, a Clinton White House official said “we’re taking the law and bending it as far as we can to capture a whole new class of guns.”

Now, BATFE is bending the law one more time. As this issue develops, the NRA will be looking at every legislative and legal option to bring our firearms import laws back in line with the Constitution.

NRA members and other concerned gun owners can submit comments on the study until May 1, 2011. Comments may be submitted by e-mail to [email protected] or by fax to (202)648-9601. Faxed comments may not exceed five pages. All comments must include name and mailing address.
 

·
Inquisitor
Joined
·
11,356 Posts
If you want to read the actual report: http://www.atf.gov/publications/firearms/012611-study-on-importality-of-certain-shotguns.pdf

If you just want to know what BATFE is considering " not suitable for traditional shotgun sports"...

(1) Folding, telescoping, or collapsible stocks;
(2) bayonet lugs;
(3) flash suppressors;
(4) magazines over 5 rounds, or a drum magazine;
(5) grenade-launcher mounts;
(6) integrated rail systems (other than on top of the receiver or barrel);
(7) light enhancing devices;
(8) excessive weight (greater than 10 pounds for 12 gauge or smaller);
(9) excessive bulk (greater than 3 inches in width and/or greater than 4 inches in depth);
(10) forward pistol grips or other protruding parts designed or used for gripping the
shotgun with the shooter’s extended hand.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,869 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
(4) magazines over 5 rounds,
So, if someone has a shotgun with a 5, 6, 7, or 8 round extension magazine they want to ban it? :ARM33: GI4
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,679 Posts
The current President is due to deliver a televised speech in February exhorting Congress to re-enact some version of the AWB. His handlers decided against making it part of last week's "state of the Union." From what I've read and heard it's a promise he made to Mexico's president. Of course, he'll also try to paint Congress into the shame corner with the Tucson nutcase's escapade.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
54 Posts
Evil Shotguns

Surely one of the main targets for this proposed ban has to be the Saiga - even though most or all of the "evil" features are put on the gun after it is imported into the U.S. in its neutered version? GI4
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
397 Posts
I do not trust the Marxist-in-Chief, the Attorney General, or the BATF to determine what are "shotguns with common military features that are unsuitable for traditional shotgun sports" to derermine whether or not they should be banned.
Someone needs to remind them all that the Second Amendment is NOT about "sports."
 

·
Cranky Old Vietnam Vet
Joined
·
10,663 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
334 Posts
They are testing the weak politicians. One crack in the armor and more weapons will follow. One startegy will be to get all weapons under the Class 3 regs. Then see how long it will take to buy a .22 for your kid.

Tahoe
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top