Yes, that is correct! Damn good magazines, spot welded just like the govt. magazines. I loaded up on them at about $9.00 each in the grease paper. Not form Midway, though, some outfit on the East Cast, name lost to me now. I bought 100.00 worth and wish I had gotten $200 worth! Who has them now?Ive had good luck with them in the past for shooter mags. I got them when Midwayusa.com had them on sale.
If I remember they called them Type 57?
Mags..
I bought two from Keep shooting to try. in the last two days I fired 100 rounds with them and zero problems.Wasn't tooling for m14s sold to Taiwan back in the day I seem to remember something about that.
I believe the original tooling from Springfield Armory was sold to Taiwan in the late 60's when production ended.Wasn't tooling for m14s sold to Taiwan back in the day I seem to remember something about that.
I’d say you are on the low end of magazine count as compared to many others here. You can never have too many.Wow. I thought I had plenty of magazines for an M-1A. I have six twenty round magazines and one ten round magazine. Some people on these forums probably have over twenty-five M-1A magazines.
Not to be argumentative either bit I get it you like CMI my point is they might be fine because of the tooling at least up to specs. One may be better than another but for at least now we are not counting our lives on them. Also a deal is a deal not all of us have unlimited funds.I don’t want to seem argumentative but tooling alone does not determine product quality. The materials used, how the tooling is used and how the tooling is maintain all play important parts in the final quality of a product.
If someone wishes to gamble on the quality of a foreign made product, that is fine with me but at the current prices of the Taiwanese magazines I would definitely go with CMI magazines which are a proven quality product. Just my two cents worth.
I tend to use the T57’s at the range, keeping the USGI mags for another day. The 57’s always worked fine, but the metal doesn’t seem as thick to me and they feel lighter.Not to be argumentative either bit I get it you like CMI my point is they might be fine because of the tooling at least up to specs. One may be better than another but for at least now we are not counting our lives on them. Also a deal is a deal not all of us have unlimited funds.
I am overly paranoid about my magazines. If they are twenty round magazines I load two of them to seventeen rounds for long term storage. And then I rotate them out every few years. If they are thirty round magazines I load two of them to around twenty-four rounds and do the same thing. Likely they would all be fine loading them to one or two rounds minus full capacity and storing them for several years. But I figure better safe then sorry. I doubt I would need more than thirty-four or forty-eight rounds if I had to grab a long gun for home defense.Everyone can approach this issue differently and that is OK. However, I simply do not tolerate a magazine that I don’t have the highest confidence in. While I don’t expect to use a small arm for defensive purposes, I am prepared to do just that. I want any magazine I possess to be able to be used with confidence in just such a case.