Joined
·
15 Posts
I am a new member to the forum but have been reading on and off for some time. I have a Pre-Ban, Springfield M1A with folder that I have been considering turning into a Bush varient much like the Smith Enterprises Navy one I recently saw posted, but with my folding stock on it.
The rifle and all parts are in excellent condition, and it shoots very very well for a rack grade rifle. The reciever is a Springfield Armory with 5 digit (0xxxxx) serial, TRW Trigger assembley, HRT Bolt and Barrel. The Barrel is in pretty much perfect condition and marked HRT 7790190 11 62 AF.
Here is my question for those of you that know the M1A and its values better than I. I just love shooting them, not a "collector" per say. For my purposes I would prefer a shorter barreled Bush version. Given that it is an original GI barrel and that it is in excellent shape, would I be better off to remove the barrel and store it for later, or possibly to reattach if I wanted to sell for some unknown reason with the original walnut stock and barrel as a service type rifle, and just have a NM Med-Heavy Bush barrel put on in the meatime for my uses? Or perhaps cut down my barrel to Bush length, and not mess with the fitting of a new one given that as it is now everything is working smoothly, shooting very nicely and I dont "need" a new barrel due to wear?
I am curious what the more informed of you, and those more familiar with collecting and values would suggest. For me, unless I need to sell it for some unknown future reason, I would prefer to build it into a more compact, but still accurate as possible personal battle rifle, especially given the addition of the folder. I dont want to spend a fortune to just make it shorter, but if in the long run it would be more in my interest to keep the original GI barrel pristine, or if the added barrel weight of a NM Med-Heavy bush barrel will make a big difference in accuracy then so be it.
Sorry for the longwindedness, but that was as small a nutshell as I could wrap it all into today I guess, lol. I would appreciate any advice you could shed to help me decide.
Thanks
The rifle and all parts are in excellent condition, and it shoots very very well for a rack grade rifle. The reciever is a Springfield Armory with 5 digit (0xxxxx) serial, TRW Trigger assembley, HRT Bolt and Barrel. The Barrel is in pretty much perfect condition and marked HRT 7790190 11 62 AF.
Here is my question for those of you that know the M1A and its values better than I. I just love shooting them, not a "collector" per say. For my purposes I would prefer a shorter barreled Bush version. Given that it is an original GI barrel and that it is in excellent shape, would I be better off to remove the barrel and store it for later, or possibly to reattach if I wanted to sell for some unknown reason with the original walnut stock and barrel as a service type rifle, and just have a NM Med-Heavy Bush barrel put on in the meatime for my uses? Or perhaps cut down my barrel to Bush length, and not mess with the fitting of a new one given that as it is now everything is working smoothly, shooting very nicely and I dont "need" a new barrel due to wear?
I am curious what the more informed of you, and those more familiar with collecting and values would suggest. For me, unless I need to sell it for some unknown future reason, I would prefer to build it into a more compact, but still accurate as possible personal battle rifle, especially given the addition of the folder. I dont want to spend a fortune to just make it shorter, but if in the long run it would be more in my interest to keep the original GI barrel pristine, or if the added barrel weight of a NM Med-Heavy bush barrel will make a big difference in accuracy then so be it.
Sorry for the longwindedness, but that was as small a nutshell as I could wrap it all into today I guess, lol. I would appreciate any advice you could shed to help me decide.
Thanks