When that rifle was made, it probably sold for under $2500. Today it's worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.$3700. That’s about what I see on gun broker.
The op rod does look chewed up pretty good. Almost like it landed on concrete or slid down a cinder block wall. If it’s still there on Monday I will go look in person. Hopefully they will take a lower offer.Nice looking rifle.
No hi-jack intended, but...?
Would there be any concern with the "chew" marks on the op rod?
I realize the rifle is in the 15 year old range and you would see "character" in a previously owned rifle.
Would the rifle have been laid on the op rod side to protect the scope mount side?
Yeah, me too. I didn't have any rashes but I had a few bends,repaired breaks and scrapes (as do most jarheads) by the time my Babyluv said "I do" with me. She didn't seem to mind either.Eh, the op-rod handle has a little bench rash, no big deal. My pickup has a little scrape on the fender too.
Thank you for the explanation Ted. Is the area I delineated in this picture the "gap area?" To the untrained eye it looks like it is.The gap refers to an area where the receiver is free floated (not bedded) from the rear of the stock liner extending to the bedded horse shoe area at the heal of the receiver. In military stocks, the area where the selector is located cannot be bedded. The opposite side is left unbedded to balance out the stress on the receiver from clamping pressure. The receiver is actually tweaked to a small degree, pulled down into the unbedded portion, to increase bedding stability. While many think this has no benefit when bedding commercial receivers, I have found that it works well and I always leave the gap when glass bedding. It even seems to have some benefit when bedding rear lugged receivers that include a torque screw, although it probably is not necessary.