M14 Forum banner
1 - 20 of 37 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
179 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
My setup is heavy guys. Trying to look at slimming down any accessories I can think of and the first thing comes to mine is the cleaning kit I store in the butstock.

My question is, in a scenario where you don't have the ability to clean your gun after each shooting, how many rounds can our M1a cycle through before the carbon build up gets too much and she starts jamming?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,283 Posts
I went though around 500 rounds of dirty Tula in my Chinese Polytech M14S before cleaning. Never had a problem. I think these M14's can go much much longer than 500 rounds. How much? I don't know.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,044 Posts
Some years ago they ran a torture test in one of the glossies, Shooting Times I think where they compared a Chinese M14 and an M1a and let em rip until failure. The Chinese rifle ran but briefly before falling completely, the M1A did quit running after several thousand rounds if I recall, but once cleaned continued to run.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,477 Posts
My setup is heavy guys. Trying to look at slimming down any accessories I can think of and the first thing comes to mine is the cleaning kit I store in the butstock.

My question is, in a scenario where you don't have the ability to clean your gun after each shooting, how many rounds can our M1a cycle through before the carbon build up gets too much and she starts jamming?
I am curious to know what possible scenario could arise where you do not have the ability to clean the gun but have to shoot thousands of rounds?

(Although, most of the people into match shooting I knew usually just punched the bore and did a general wipe-down after a match or practice. Thorough cleanings were reserved for after the shooting season.)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,291 Posts
The NRA American Rifle magazine some years ago published a similar test between the M1A and the Chicom version and somewhere around 700+ rounds the Chinese M14 lost it's headspace due to hardness of the bolt lugs and failed to fire. The M1A went on for large number of rounds with no failures if I recall. Isolated incident, possibly but it did happen. If the rifle became so fouled that the gas system "quit" you could possibly keep on running the rifle manually, think of it as a bolt action rifle.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
17,148 Posts
The carbon itself is not the concern. The M14 gas cylinder/piston design is quite remarkable.

The main concern is that over time, carbon attracts moisture. Moisture promotes corrosion. If you live in a environment with high humidity or extreme cold, you need to clean the rifle more often.

Try removing the gas plug from an M1A that's been sitting around for 20 years. RNGR2

You can save weight by ditching the cleaning rods and getting a pull-thru cable from Otis or Boresnake.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,199 Posts
It's going to depend on how dirty your ammo is when fired and how humid it is in your area.

I would think someone in low humidity climates will be able to fire more than someone in Florida, using the same ammo.

I've never kept anything in the butt stock hold. It's a waste unless your in a foxhole. Most people aren't and can make better accommodations.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,942 Posts
It's going to depend on how dirty your ammo is when fired and how humid it is in your area.

I would think someone in low humidity climates will be able to fire more than someone in Florida, using the same ammo.

I've never kept anything in the butt stock hold. It's a waste unless your in a foxhole. Most people aren't and can make better accommodations.
^^^ to many variables to answer this question.^^^
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,475 Posts
A bit off-topic here - several years ago I did a similar test with my Beretta 391 "Urika" 12 gauge trap gun because a fellow shooter was bragging on how his Remington 1100 would fire forever when dirty, so we agreed to a shoot-off without cleaning. He was using factory-new AA loads and I shot my loads of Red Dot - which is not the cleanest-burning powder around.

The 1100 failed due to short-stroking after 9 boxes of ammo, a total of 225 rounds or so. He scrubbed it and we continued over the course of three weeks and the 1100 kept failing at about the same point. My 391 never did fail to feed, chamber, extract or eject through over 100 boxes (2500 rounds) of my dirty Red Dot loads. I finally gave up as the gun was so dirty I could not stand to look at it. After cleaning, the only difference was some discoloration in the gas system. I can say with confidence the 391 is probably the most reliable gas shotgun around.

My shooting buddy traded in the 1100 for a Beretta and is still happy about it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
556 Posts
Failure

This will not answer your question but it will give you a little insight as to cleaning the barrel...I phoned Sierra bullets and asked them about the round count on their test barrel in .308 caliber and when they needed to clean theirs and was told that about 200 rounds the barrel would start to foul out and would shoot like a shotgun and after a dozen or so rounds later it would go back to shooting very accurately for a couple hundred more...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,877 Posts
Lots of opinions!!!
Sounds like each owner should do what he/she is comfortable with.
But....if I were a prepper, I would keep my shtf firearms clean. Kind of counter productive to go into an emergency situation in the hole.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
179 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
After each range outing (~200rounds) I would clean the gas system and notice a lot of carbon. I'm using mostly hirtengerber ammo. This leads me thinking what if I needed to grab my gun and go, who in their right mind would grab the gas wrench and tools to clean the gas system from carbon build up out on the field.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,449 Posts
I have a picture of an M14 dated September 14, 1961 that shows an M14 on top of a pile of 30,000 rounds fired in one day in the same rifle at the Springfield Armory. This was part of the standard testing for both the M1 and the M14. Impressed the heck out of me. It doesn't say if it was semi-auto or full auto-my guess was semi.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10,199 Posts
After each range outing (~200rounds) I would clean the gas system and notice a lot of carbon. I'm using mostly hirtengerber ammo. This leads me thinking what if I needed to grab my gun and go, who in their right mind would grab the gas wrench and tools to clean the gas system from carbon build up out on the field.
Chance favors the prepared mind. Get a checklist together.
Heck, I have a checklist just to go to the range for the day.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,477 Posts
I have a picture of an M14 dated September 14, 1961 that shows an M14 on top of a pile of 30,000 rounds fired in one day in the same rifle at the Springfield Armory. This was part of the standard testing for both the M1 and the M14. Impressed the heck out of me. It doesn't say if it was semi-auto or full auto-my guess was semi.
It was a 30,000 round endurance test. It was not completed in one day. It was a mix of semi-automatic and full-automatic fire. The rifle was cleaned periodically, I believe every 2,000 to 4,000 rounds. I think I have a report on it somewhere.

A 30,000 round endurance test was never part of the "standard testing" for the M1 or M14. This test was a publicity demonstration, necessitated by the number of quality issues from the users, which had gotten the ear of Congress. Springfield needed to show that the design was solid.



The M14 had a very unfortunate development, development delays, years of testing, delays in production, poor initial quality, and worst of all very poor public relations. Remember the Berlin crisis of 1961? Newspapers were full of pictures of US Army troops looking exactly like they did in WW2, 16 years earlier, while other NATO countries and worse the "Commies" armed with modern weapons....

 
1 - 20 of 37 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top