Joined
·
4,883 Posts
I’m with mic25 on competency, I have two receivers holding a variety of GI parts that I put on on action the were barreled and headspaced
GI parts question
So, I frequently see people looking for hra, winchester, etc specifically for parts.
Is this because people want consistent manufacturers for builds for collector reasons like wanting consistency in a build, or scarcity leading to value?
Or do people feel that there are specific differences in quality across the different manufacturers?
Is this because people want consistent manufacturers for builds for collector reasons like wanting consistency in a build, or scarcity leading to value?
Or do people feel that there are specific differences in quality across the different manufacturers?
21 - 25 of 25 Posts
Joined
·
3,964 Posts
One advantage TRW had was use of coining dies to even further refine the same forging others were using as is. Same with their bolts .The top center and sides were forged done ,requiring no machining.
They were the only company to use solid one piece op rod ,and only maker to refine the receiver left and right lugs.
What does al that matter ? Just a slight edge in grain orientation making a slightly stronger finished part.
They were the only company to use solid one piece op rod ,and only maker to refine the receiver left and right lugs.
What does al that matter ? Just a slight edge in grain orientation making a slightly stronger finished part.
Joined
·
4,883 Posts
Joined
·
2,148 Posts
So..does that mean I should save all the SA parts and use up all the TRWs and Winchesters first?
21 - 25 of 25 Posts
