M14 Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,326 Posts
Someone smarter than me is going to have to explain the glueing procedure of my Rockola into the Sage chassis for me
Maybey I should join and cross post the question at arfcom
 
  • Like
Reactions: CAVman

·
Cranky Old Vietnam Vet
Joined
·
10,663 Posts
Someone smarter than me is going to have to explain the glueing procedure of my Rockola into the Sage chassis for me
Maybey I should join and cross post the question at arfcom
Yeah, that was Bizarre! The M14 is Glued/Bedded into the Sage EBR Chassis !?

Huh? I'm starting to think the author has never actually met a M14/Sage EBR ?

GI3

CAVman in WYoming
 
  • Like
Reactions: hardheaded

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,586 Posts
Nothing really interesting in the article, clearly the writer is pro mouse gun. I will agree the M14 is way more expensive eliminating most from shooting it in competition. I will agree it was never designed to be a sniper rifle and making it fit that role is best left to the government or folks with deep pockets(very expensive).

The good news is when built from the ground up as a sniper rifle(such as the XM25,M25) it will keep up with the best of the best. It is rugged and dependable but best of all it is hard hitting out at distances the AR15/M16 can only dream about.

Those who depend on this rifle to saves lives (DMR) speak only praise, that in and of itself speaks volumes!

Oh just in case you guys were wondering, I won't be trading in my M14s anytime soon.

RENGI2
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,213 Posts
Infantrymen from every branch fielding a DMR in combat have nothing but praise for the guns’ performance in the vast expanses of Iraq and Afghanistan.
In the real world, when making a product, there's only three people whose opinion count: (1) the consumer, (2) the consumer, and (3) the consumer.

Nuff said.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,352 Posts
While I like the M4 and M16A2 type carbine/rifle.
I still prefer the M14.
Once I got the EBR setup correctly, it's stayed accurate.....rock solid, stayed accurate.
His comments about the M1 Carbine were a little bizarre. Carbine's recoil, awe come on dude, really ? I doubt he's owned or shot one.....I have.
The lasting tribute to the M14 is it's dirt and dust indifferent.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,326 Posts
While I like the M4 and M16A2 type carbine/rifle.
I still prefer the M14.
Once I got the EBR setup correctly, it's stayed accurate.....rock solid, stayed accurate.
His comments about the M1 Carbine were a little bizarre. Carbine's recoil, awe come on dude, really ? I doubt he's owned or shot one.....I have.
The lasting tribute to the M14 is it's dirt and dust indifferent.
You reminded me of the other part of his article I forgot to mention
The uncontrollable recoil of a M1 Carbine What a putz
 
  • Like
Reactions: hurryinhoosier

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,739 Posts
It would seem the author writes from innuendo and not entirely factual information, or could it be that he is letting his personal opinion get in the way of the truth?

The M-1 Carbine thing again, really? Frozen Chinese Jackets stopping rounds? I have seen .30 Carbine rounds pierce an empty aluminum beer keg (both sides) from 50 yards. It was meant to replace the .45 pistol as a personal defense weapon, not to replace a rifle.

The author has to understand that our Military goes to war with the equipment it has on hand at the time, not necessarily with what they would like to have. There is a cost factor in everything that the Military does, which is daunting for them because the politicians hold the purse strings.

The M-1 Garand had to be redesigned for the .30 M2 cartridge because the decision was made to use the vast stocks of .30 caliber ammunition that was in government storehouses. The M-14's were brought back into service because they were immediately available. He should read the history of the M1-C and M1-D Garands being used as sniper rifles and how long that took to get in place.

The author also points to the fact that the AR platform has been around since the 1950's, thus intimating that the AR-10's have been readily available since then, really?

I guess that the old saw about a little bit of knowledge being a dangerous thing might apply in the author's case.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
440 Posts
"Accuracy is a measure of consistency when it comes to rifles"

What? Accuracy is how close one is hitting where one is aiming. Precision is how close two measurements are. One can be precise but inaccurate, such as a tight group far from the bull's-eye. One can be accurate but lack precision, such as hitting the bull's eye 3 times but also having 3 flyers. What was the author trying to say?

I have been taught that a DMR is not a sniper rifle. Is that still true? He also keeps switching between bedded, match rifles and actions in EBR chassis. Actions aren't bedded in EBR chassis are they? Do people take match conditioned, bedded, non-chassis rifles into battle and subject them to rough handling? He talks about the handguard, I asked about that on another thread and it turns out, that's a match M1 Garand thing. I've never handled a sniper rifle like a M40, M24, or M110. Can those get knocked around and still maintain accuracy and precision?

I think you could probably make modifications to a M14 or M1A that would improve accuracy and precision while still keeping it sturdy enough for rough battlefield handling. The mods would not make it a sniper rifle but good enough for DMR purposes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,265 Posts
Nothing really interesting in the article, clearly the writer is pro mouse gun. I will agree the M14 is way more expensive eliminating most from shooting it in competition. I will agree it was never designed to be a sniper rifle and making it fit that role is best left to the government or folks with deep pockets(very expensive).

The good news is when built from the ground up as a sniper rifle(such as the XM25,M25) it will keep up with the best of the best. It is rugged and dependable but best of all it is hard hitting out at distances the AR15/M16 can only dream about.

Those who depend on this rifle to saves lives (DMR) speak only praise, that in and of itself speaks volumes!

Oh just in case you guys were wondering, I won't be trading in my M14s anytime soon.

RENGI2
Very true, my Marine was awarded a Bronze Star "V" for his actions with a M39 M14 in Astan
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,137 Posts
It is still cheaper for uncle sam to take M14's from his pile of M14's in storage and throw them into an EBR chassis for a DMR. Buying a SR-25 costs about 2 or 3 times the price due to uncle sam already owning M14's in the first place. And they are plenty accurate. My EBR shoots around .5-.75 moa if I am patient. I shoot 1000yards all the time with 175g hand loads at a 24inch gong. If I was uncle sam I would keep doing EBR's till the mountain of M14's is gone. Why not?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,185 Posts
Another case of "Don't confuse me with facts, my mind(?) is made up". Maybe if the author were to talk to someone who actually knew what he was talking about(maybe 'The Gunny' or a combat marine or dog face who had been in combat), he could get his facts straight, but then, no one would print his article.
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top