M14 Forum banner

1 - 1 of 1 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,001 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Yesterday, counsel for plaintiffs Brendan Richards, Mark Haynie, The Calguns Foundation, and the Second Amendment Foundation filed an amended complaint in the case of Haynie, et al. v. Kamala Harris, et al., a federal civil rights lawsuit challenging California’s “Assault Weapons” laws as unconstitutional.

The court filing states that plaintiffs seek “injunctive and declaratory relief against Defendants [Kamala Harris and DOJ] that the California Penal Codes and Regulations defining Assault Weapons are unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous and therefore result in wrongful arrests and seizures of lawfully possessed/owned arms.” The filing also claims that “the unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous definitions of assault weapons and the ongoing risk of arrest and seizure have a chilling effect on the fundamental right to keep and bear arms of ordinary and common design as protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

The case stems from a series of unconstitutional arrests and property seizures relating to firearms mis-identified as “assault weapons” by law enforcement. Mr. Richards was himself improperly arrested and had legal firearms seized twice on two difference occasions by two different law enforcement agencies since 2010.

http://www.calgunsfoundation.org/2013/12/amended-complaint-filed-cgfs-haynie-v-pleasanton-assault-weapons-challenge/

-----------

Over the years CGF has been slowly turning the tides on the anti-gun legislation on the books. Obviously this would be a huge win for us and perhaps set precedent across country for others to challenge their states restrictive gun laws.

It's about time we take back this state from the progressives. Help support CGF with any contribution you can afford. I'm in for $20.
 
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
Top