I'm interested in other's thoughts as well.
Really depends on the weapon in question.I’ve seen this discussion numerous times on this site and others and the .308Win always seems to get the nod. Nearly every discussion revolves around the efficiency of the .308Win cartridge and reduced recoil. Those are not difficult to understand or believe. What surprises me is that nobody discusses the chamber, or more specifically the throat area.
Nearly ever modern cartridge chamber (including 308Win) follows the same configuration.
1. A short straight section of parallel freebore just slightly bigger than caliber groove size followed by...
2. A tapered lead section between 1 and 2 degrees to the caliber dimension
The 30-06 chamber follows the much older design pattern of having no parallel freebore and instead uses a tapered throat from the case neck down to the caliber dimension. This makes me think the 30-06 has maybe been held back by this throat design in service rifle type matches. Thoughts?
Yep. It really does.Really depends on the weapon in question.
Art- I fully agree on this. Even if the “mechanical” potential accuracy between the two was identical, I think the reduced recoil and economics (less powder to buy per shot) would cause the 308 to be the logical choice.I think the fact that many competitive shooters re-barreling their M1s to .308 speaks volumes
The gas trap barrels and the 1939 M1 Ball barrels have the no-lead design:Lysander,
Thanks for posting that information. Didn’t realize the M1 had that chamber. Did that design go back to the inception of the Garand, or did it come later?
It is a common myth that the M14, M60, M240, etc chambers are larger, looser, bigger than SAAMI spec chambers.Also the 7.62nato chambers if I remember correctly (I don’t have the drawings in front of me as I’m not at work) but the case body of the chamber is also looser/bigger than 308w SAAMI.
I used that reamer in the 03 that I rebuilt also.Frank- thanks for the thoughtful response. I think your comments/experience align with my belief about a good chamber bringing excellent accuracy to 30-06. The chamber you describe sounds like a good one (30-06HVT). That would be fun to try out in a M1903 USMC sniper clone too. I have not put a new 30-06 barrel on a Garand or 1903 in a while, but those used the SAAMI reamer. They shoot well for what they are, but next time it will be something better like the HVT. I also think my rechambering plan might have merit when the 308 throat is smoked....unless of course you start making some M1 Garand heavies..
Like I said I was going off of memory and I need the drawings in front of me. If I recall correctly the throat diameter on the 7.62 NATO is .316” and the 308w SAAMI is .310”. I don’t recall freebore length on those.It is a common myth that the M14, M60, M240, etc chambers are larger, looser, bigger than SAAMI spec chambers.
Here is an overlay of several "NATO" chambers, as you can see the diametrical difference between the bodies is 0.0007 to 0.0013. The headspace difference is around 0.010, with the MG chambers noticeably shorter.
View attachment 498313
View attachment 498314
View attachment 498315
It is a common myth that the M14, M60, M240, etc chambers are larger, looser, bigger than SAAMI spec chambers.
Here is an overlay of several "NATO" chambers, as you can see the diametrical difference between the bodies is 0.0007 to 0.0013. The headspace difference is around 0.010, with the MG chambers noticeably shorter.
On the headspace difference of around .010” are you talking about go +.010“ if using a field gauge vs saami on 308w being go +.006” typically being max.?
I know on the drawing I have for 7.62 nato it shows a min. dimension of 1.628” which is .002” shorter than a 308w min of 1.630”.
I didn’t know the MG chambers could be even shorter? Any idea as to why?
Ain't no such thing as an 7.62mm NATO chamber.Like I said I was going off of memory and I need the drawings in front of me. If I recall correctly the throat diameter on the 7.62 NATO is .316” and the 308w SAAMI is .310”. I don’t recall freebore length on those.
I can post the drawings on Monday. I have them all saved on my computer at work.
Quite possible the folks ordering your barrels don't even know what chamber they want. Not unusual for military " mechanics" to just grab a component off the shelf and expect it to perform it's function.Well that cracks me up and not surprising.
If for example the 7.62 nato spec reamer is suppose to be a standard you think that would be the standard used in guns?
I’ve seen the same thing if you will in production guns (commercial) there is the saami min spec standard but that doesn’t mean a manufacturer uses that standard.
This is a good reason why whenever someone orders test barrels from us and don’t supply a print for everything and just call out 300wm or any other caliber/chamber I reference the tool part number on the drawing and put that info on the sales order confirmation copy so there is a track record of what we made the barrels to. They get all that info sent to them in the confirmation for review. That way it cannot come back on us making the barrels wrong.
I’m dealing with this headache right now with an overseas customers for finished M40 sniper rifle barrels for they’re military. The order is for two batches of 350. They’re prints don’t show enough detail when it comes to the chamber. They call it 7.62x51mm. So I’ve sent them several different prints for them to tell me which reamer to use and no one at the arsenal (can’t talk to anyone directly as is has to go thru a contractor which no one there knows anything about guns) can tell me which exact chamber spec it is!
So I’m hesitant on taking the job as they have a accuracy requirement at 200 yards the barrel has to meet. They say they are using three different types of ammo which are 308w Federal GMM with a 175gr bullet, M80 ball, and a 3rd some foreign 308 match round which escapes me right now.
So they ordered two barrels for testing. One with the 7.62 nato reamer and one with the 308w SAAMI reamer.
I’ve also asked how are they inspecting the chambers and bores so we do apples and apples for inspection. No one gets back to me. That’s why I’m hesitant on taking the job. Poor communication and I don’t want anything coming back at us.